杭州市拱墅(shu)區(qu)人民法院一審公開宣判

被告人(ren)吳(wu)秀芳過失(shi)致(zhi)人(ren)死(si)亡案

2023年5月18日上午9時40分，杭州市(shi)拱墅區人(ren)民法院對被告(gao)人(ren)吳秀(xiu)芳(fang)(fang)過失致人(ren)死(si)亡(wang)一案進(jin)行公(gong)開宣判，以過失致人(ren)死(si)亡(wang)罪(zui)判處被告(gao)人(ren)吳秀(xiu)芳(fang)(fang)有期徒刑一年，緩刑二年。

法(fa)院(yuan)經審理查明：被告人吳秀芳從(cong)事(shi)保(bao)姆(mu)工作多年(nian)，并于2022年(nian)6月8日經介紹(shao)受(shou)雇至(zhi)陳(chen)某江、趙某家中從(cong)事(shi)保(bao)姆(mu)工作，專職(zhi)照看陳(chen)家幼(you)女即被害人陳(chen)某某（歿年(nian)21月齡）。

2022年6月14日20時(shi)許，吳(wu)秀芳(fang)帶陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)從杭州市某(mou)小區2幢3單元15樓(lou)乘坐電(dian)(dian)梯下至(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)1樓(lou)，其(qi)間(jian)顧自瀏覽(lan)手(shou)機，臨近(jin)1樓(lou)時(shi)吳(wu)秀芳(fang)不再瀏覽(lan)手(shou)機，轉向并招(zhao)呼陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)“走(zou)(zou)(zou)了(le)(le)走(zou)(zou)(zou)了(le)(le)”，20時(shi)01分(fen)(fen)(fen)13秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)電(dian)(dian)梯到1樓(lou)，見陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)手(shou)摸電(dian)(dian)梯面板(ban)而(er)上前制(zhi)止并稱“會有危險的”“跟著阿(a)(a)姨走(zou)(zou)(zou)”，01分(fen)(fen)(fen)17秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)吳(wu)秀芳(fang)拉著滑(hua)板(ban)車自行出(chu)(chu)電(dian)(dian)梯，01分(fen)(fen)(fen)19秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)電(dian)(dian)梯開始關門，01分(fen)(fen)(fen)20秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)吳(wu)秀芳(fang)回頭見陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)未出(chu)(chu)電(dian)(dian)梯，試(shi)圖用滑(hua)板(ban)車阻擋電(dian)(dian)梯門未果，01分(fen)(fen)(fen)21秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)電(dian)(dian)梯門關閉。陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)在(zai)電(dian)(dian)梯內哭(ku)喊，吳(wu)秀芳(fang)在(zai)電(dian)(dian)梯外以“阿(a)(a)姨來了(le)(le)”“不哭(ku)”等言語安撫陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)，并按電(dian)(dian)梯按鈕試(shi)圖打開電(dian)(dian)梯門。電(dian)(dian)梯停留約30秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)后(hou)(hou)自動上行。20時(shi)02分(fen)(fen)(fen)10秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)電(dian)(dian)梯停至(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)8樓(lou)，陳(chen)(chen)某(mou)某(mou)出(chu)(chu)電(dian)(dian)梯至(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)8樓(lou)過道，后(hou)(hou)爬(pa)上8樓(lou)過道窗臺(tai)，02分(fen)(fen)(fen)55秒(miao)(miao)(miao)(miao)墜樓(lou)后(hou)(hou)落至(zhi)(zhi)(zhi)2樓(lou)平(ping)臺(tai)。

而后(hou)，吳(wu)秀芳至樓上等(deng)處找(zhao)尋陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)，其間將(jiang)陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)走失情(qing)況電話告知(zhi)陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)之父陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)江。陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)江在小(xiao)區(qu)內找(zhao)尋，后(hou)在2樓平臺找(zhao)到陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)并送醫(yi)搶救(jiu)。陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)因顱腦外傷、失血性休(xiu)克等(deng)經搶救(jiu)無(wu)效于當(dang)日死亡。吳(wu)秀芳主動向至現場排(pai)查(cha)的(de)民警表明(ming)身份并說(shuo)明(ming)其將(jiang)陳(chen)某(mou)(mou)某(mou)(mou)遺留電梯內等(deng)情(qing)況，又趕至醫(yi)院了解(jie)搶救(jiu)情(qing)況，后(hou)被公(gong)安機關帶走調查(cha)。

法院審(shen)理(li)認為(wei)(wei)，吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)作為(wei)(wei)受雇照看(kan)幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)的專(zhuan)職保(bao)姆，負有對幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)生(sheng)命(ming)健(jian)康安(an)全(quan)(quan)的看(kan)護責任，但其于晚上8時許(xu)帶幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)進入電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯后(hou)，先是(shi)顧自瀏覽手機，在(zai)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯到(dao)達1樓后(hou)，未采用(yong)控制電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯門(men)讓幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)先出電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯或(huo)以手牽、懷抱等方(fang)式確保(bao)幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)安(an)全(quan)(quan)離開電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯，而是(shi)自己先走出電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯，導致幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)被(bei)單獨滯留在(zai)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯內。吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)明知對幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)而言(yan)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯為(wei)(wei)較(jiao)大(da)風險場(chang)所(suo)(suo)，但因疏忽大(da)意(yi)而將(jiang)幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)單獨滯留在(zai)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯內，以致發生(sheng)幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)單獨走出電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯并爬窗墜(zhui)樓死亡(wang)(wang)的后(hou)果(guo)，其行為(wei)(wei)應(ying)以過(guo)(guo)失致人(ren)死亡(wang)(wang)罪(zui)(zui)(zui)定性(xing)。公(gong)(gong)訴機關(guan)(guan)指控吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)犯過(guo)(guo)失致人(ren)死亡(wang)(wang)罪(zui)(zui)(zui)的事(shi)實清楚，證據確實、充分(fen)，指控的罪(zui)(zui)(zui)名(ming)(ming)成立(li)。吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)因過(guo)(guo)失犯罪(zui)(zui)(zui)造成1名(ming)(ming)幼兒(er)(er)(er)(er)死亡(wang)(wang)，致當事(shi)家庭(ting)陷(xian)入不幸，并給其家人(ren)造成心(xin)理(li)創傷，應(ying)依法懲(cheng)處(chu)。綜(zong)合考慮本案存在(zai)窗臺高度偏低、無防(fang)墜(zhui)裝置等客(ke)觀因素，以及吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)在(zai)發現被(bei)害人(ren)未出電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯且電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯門(men)即將(jiang)關(guan)(guan)閉時，用(yong)滑板車試(shi)圖阻擋電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯門(men)關(guan)(guan)閉，未果(guo)后(hou)在(zai)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯外(wai)言(yan)語安(an)撫被(bei)害人(ren)并按電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯按鈕試(shi)圖打開電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)梯門(men)，后(hou)參與找尋等具體情況，可(ke)認定犯罪(zui)(zui)(zui)情節較(jiao)輕。吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)在(zai)公(gong)(gong)安(an)機關(guan)(guan)上門(men)排查時主(zhu)(zhu)動交代其主(zhu)(zhu)要犯罪(zui)(zui)(zui)事(shi)實，具有自首情節，依法可(ke)從輕處(chu)罰(fa)。鑒(jian)于吳(wu)秀(xiu)芳(fang)犯罪(zui)(zui)(zui)后(hou)認罪(zui)(zui)(zui)悔罪(zui)(zui)(zui)，無犯罪(zui)(zui)(zui)前科劣跡，宣(xuan)告緩(huan)刑(xing)對所(suo)(suo)居住社區沒有重大(da)不良影響，對其可(ke)適用(yong)緩(huan)刑(xing)。法院遂作出上述(shu)判決。

公訴人、被告人及其辯護人、被害人的法定代理人及其訴訟代理人到庭參加宣判。部分人大代表、政協委員、群眾代表、新聞媒體記者參與旁聽。（拱墅法院）